Book Log

Here's a log of the books I've read since late 2003. More organized ratings of authors and books are on another page, and you can skip to its entries for individual books by clicking on the icons next to the entries here.

Reading now: Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything, Steven Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner

good 2012/01/30: Launching The Innovation Renaissance: A New Path to Bring Smart Ideas to Market Fast, Alex Tabarrok: I agree with what he's saying and somehow didn't learn too much; but I can't complain about such a short essay.
good 2012/01/28: The Great Stagnation: How America Ate All The Low-Hanging Fruit of Modern History, Got Sick, and Will (Eventually) Feel Better, Tyler Cowen: An interesting perspective that I'd gotten plenty of from the blogosphere before reading this
good 2012/01/22: The Overflowing Brain: Information Overload and the Limits of Working Memory, Torkel Klingberg: You might not guess that a book about working memory would be much fun, but this was fairly informative and enjoyable. Contrary to my expectations, it really is almost entirely about working memory.
bad 2011/12/27: Disciplined Minds, Jeff Schmidt: Somewhat thought provoking, but mostly unsatisfying. Most all of the author's complaints about PhD programs don't seem to apply to top computer science programs; I don't know how accurate they are elsewhere. I was surprised by this book's tone when I started reading it; somehow, when I first added it to my "to read" list, I hadn't realized that the book is targeted to "radicals" and "activists." The author doesn't spend any space trying to explain why the reader might want to become such a thing, so that was another serious turn-off for me.
bad 2011/12/08: From Two Cultures To No Culture, Robert Whelan: A big old pile of meta-discussion about who said what about whom
good 2011/11/30: Neurodiversity: Discovering the Extraordinary Gifts of Autism, ADHD, Dyslexia, and Other Brain Differences, Thomas Armstrong: Lots of really interesting stuff in here, but the special education angle didn't appeal to me.
good 2011/11/24: Comfortably Unaware, Richard A. Oppenlander: This was an aggravating book. On the first page, I noticed a typo, a horrifying font/spacing convention, and the clumsy, patronizing, and preachy prose style. However, the core of information in the book seems very worth knowing. The way it is presented leaves me wondering how much I can trust in its accuracy, but I haven't yet seen a reason to doubt it. It would be nice to find a better, less emotional presentation of the same essential facts about the costs of animal-based food production and consumption.
good 2011/11/20: Everyman, Philip Roth: I went into this one not realizing that the focus would be aging, illness, and death. Doesn't sound so enjoyable, right? It turned out to be a fun read.
good 2011/11/10: Falling Man, Don DeLillo: At first I wasn't very optimistic; 9/11 is a pretty heavy subject for DeLillo. However, he wound up pulling it off very well. The usual surreal elements crept in eventually.
good 2011/10/20: Triumph of the City: How Our Greatest Invention Makes Us Richer, Smarter, Greener, Healthier, and Happier, Edward Glaeser: Fun to read, though perhaps a bit of preaching to the choir, in my case
good 2011/09/26: Bowling Alone, Robert D. Putnam: Definitely got me thinking, though the focus on particular archaic-feeling forms of social involvement seemed undermotivated.
good 2011/08/18: The Social Animal: The Hidden Sources of Love, Character, and Achievement, David Brooks: The first third or so was great. There's a very meta aspect to the later parts of the book, which was clever at first, but which I started to feel was being abused. I won't spoil the details of what I'm talking about. ;-)
good 2011/08/05: The Long Thaw: How Humans Are Changing the Next 100,000 Years of Earth's Climate, David Archer: A reasonable description of how little we know about climate changes and our effect on them
good 2011/06/30: The Lonely Crowd, David Riesman: Thought-provoking, though it was often hard for me to get past the dated elements of the book. The last few chapters were especially unsatisfying, partly for that reason.
good 2011/06/05: The Evolution of Cooperation, Robert Axelrod: I've seen the executive summary of this material so many times in other books that it's hard to evaluate the worth of the full version.
good 2011/06/05: The Revolution: A Manifesto, Ron Paul: Largely agreeable, though not very novel
good 2011/05/31: Imperial, William T. Vollmann: Long enough that I often wondered whether it was worth finishing. Overall an enjoyable experience, raising interesting issues about how large populations of people can organize themselves in a modern setting.
good 2011/02/13: The Death and Life of Great American Cities, Jane Jacobs: Interesting ideas that I need to ponder more. It didn't always hold my interest in the particulars.
good 2011/01/01: The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin, Benjamin Franklin: It's hard to imagine a book written today being so explicit about a search for "moral perfection," but I found the approach really attractive. I wonder how thoroughly the author followed through with it.
good 2010/12/17: Medieval Cities: Their Origins and the Revival of Trade, Henri Pirenne: This was enjoyable enough, but still on the low end of "good."
good 2010/12/08: The Genial Gene: Deconstructing Darwinian Selfishness, Joan Roughgarden: Some interesting stuff, though I kept getting hung up on what exactly was the definition of "truth" of an evolutionary theory that this book was oriented around.
great 2010/11/28: Founders at Work: Stories of Startups' Early Days, Jessica Livingston: This was really fun and seems like a great extended pep talk for people considering doing the startup thing.
good 2010/11/23: City on the Edge: Buffalo, New York, 1900 - present, Mark Goldman: I seesawed between liking and not liking it. The not liking came from feeling that it was a "one thing after another" kind of history book without a broader message (and also from some poor copyediting and laugh-out-loud bad phrasing). The liking probably had most to do with the consistent anti-urban-renewal focus.
good 2010/10/24: How to Win Friends and Influence People, Dale Carnegie: It's unclear how useful this will be, but it was very entertaining. I'm glad I followed Paul Graham's advice and got my hands on an early edition, complete with content that doesn't follow today's rules for political correctness.
good 2010/10/08: Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon, Daniel Dennett: Well-written; I'm not sure exactly what I took away from it, but I enjoyed the ride.
great 2010/10/02: The High Cost of Free Parking, Donald Shoup: This was a long one, but it was a lot of fun to read.
good 2010/09/03: The Future of Europe: Reform or Decline, Alberto Alesina and Francesco Giavazzi: Interesting, though I'm not sure I got much out of it
great 2010/08/29: Hierarchy in the Forest: The Evolution of Egalitarian Behavior, Christopher Boehm: A very interesting perspective on the roots of political behavior
good 2010/08/23: Schooling in Capitalist America: Educational Reform and the Contradictions of Economic Life, Samuel Bowles and Herbert Gintis: A well-written presentation of an interesting perspective. I got a good chuckle out of the socialist elements, which stayed manageable until the last part of the book, which is entirely skippable.
good 2010/08/19: Tomorrow's Professor: Preparing for Careers in Science and Engineering, Richard M. Reis: Like with the last one, I'm not sure if I got much out of reading this. In contrast, the prose here seemed overly preachy/condescending and generally didn't leave me with warm feelings.
good 2010/08/15: A Ph.D. Is Not Enough!, Peter J. Feibelman: Quite well-written, and short enough that I don't feel bad about not thinking too hard about what I got out of it.
great 2010/08/01: The Big Questions: Tackling the Problems of Philosophy with Ideas from Mathematics, Economics and Physics, Steven E. Landsburg: Short and sweet, but with high enjoyment value per page
good 2010/07/30: From Poverty to Prosperity: Intangible Assets, Hidden Liabilities and the Lasting Triumph over Scarcity, Arnold Kling and Nick Schulz: Not bad, not great; for me, more like a cheerleading exercise than anything else.
good 2010/07/23: Sex and Reason, Richard Posner: Clear-headed and thought-provoking, though not earth-shaking
good 2010/07/20: Midnight's Children, Salman Rushdie: Entertaining enough. Too long and too much foreshadowing.
good 2010/06/10: Free to Choose, Milton Friedman and Rose D. Friedman: I forgot to log this book until some weeks after finishing it, so I don't remember details, but it was probably pretty good. :-)
good 2010/05/12: Goodbye, Columbus, Philip Roth: Decent
good 2010/04/27: Winesburg, Ohio, Sherwood Anderson: I read this because Henry Miller seemed to be a fan. It was all right, but somehow didn't quite do it for me.
great 2010/04/03: The Evolution of God, Robert Wright: Compared to my expectations, this was a lot more about politics and a lot less about evolutionary psychology. Near the end, though, the author brings in a really interesting message about the origins of morality in social evolution.
good 2010/03/21: Fixing College Education: A New Curriculum for the Twenty-First Century, Charles Muscatine: This book doesn't seem to have much to say about education in highly technical fields. Thus, while I agree with the book's criticisms, I'm not sure the proposed solutions are generally applicable.
good 2010/03/18: Simple Rules for a Complex World, Richard Epstein: Not always engrossing, but I feel more law-y already
good 2010/02/18: Inherent Vice, Thomas Pynchon: Different but fun
bad 2010/02/02: Why Gods Persist: A Scientific Approach to Religion, Robert Hinde: I had to bail on this one early on. It was clumsy stylistically and didn't seem to be painting any kind of big picture.
good 2010/01/24: The Colossus of Maroussi, Henry Miller: Very lively
good 2010/01/13: Democracy in America, Volume I, Alexis de Tocqueville: Interesting, though the value per page didn't seem quite high enough. Still, it stands the test of time pretty well.
good 2009/12/10: Guns, Germs, and Steel, Jared Diamond: Interesting without really being riveting
good 2009/11/27: Realizing Freedom: Libertarian Theory, History, and Practice, Tom G. Palmer: Some insightful stuff, but also a few chapters that are too much about arguing against particular works; not enough convincing rational argument in general
great 2009/11/18: The Center Cannot Hold: My Journey Through Madness, Elyn R. Saks: Kind of harrowing, but a real page-turner
great 2009/11/15: The Satanic Verses, Salman Rushdie: Reminds me of Thomas Pynchon without the geek factor.
good 2009/10/12: The Voluntary City: Choice, Community, and Civil Society, David T. Beito, Peter Gordon, and Alexander Tabarrok: It didn't always have me on the edge of my seat, but there was still plenty of thought-provoking stuff.
good 2009/10/01: Power, Sex, Suicide: Mitochondria and the Meaning of Life, Nick Lane: Interesting and well-written, in that plucky British style
great 2009/09/26: Sustainable Energy - Without the Hot Air, David J. C. MacKay: A really enjoyable and informative read. There's definitely something to be said for the signature British writing style.
great 2009/09/06: Amazons: An Intimate Memoir By the First Woman to Play in the National Hockey League, Don DeLillo: Really well put together, like an extended poem
bad 2009/09/04: Ancestral Roots: Modern Living and Human Evolution, Timothy Clack: There was some interesting information and speculation in here, but too much of the book came across as moralizing. The copy-editing was also notably poor.
bad 2009/08/21: Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and Its Quarrels with Science, Paul R. Gross and Norman Levitt: I didn't feel like I learned much from this book. The authors attacked particular quotations from a hand-picking of authors, so it's hard to tell which points are valid against the whole body of literature that they're dissecting. I don't know how it would be possible to do better, but that doesn't mean that this book is very helpful. The prose was also a little too purple for me.
good 2009/08/14: A Devil's Chaplain, Richard Dawkins: Some decent material. I don't really like Dawkins's over-flowery writing style.
bad 2009/08/07: Mazel, Rebecca Goldstein: This one ended up being a wild ride. The first few chapters seemed very promising, but the bulk of the book just didn't interest me.
good 2009/07/25: The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering, Frederick Brooks: For a light read, I enjoyed this well enough, more for the retro appeal than for the presence of much advice that seems relevant today.
good 2009/07/23: The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature, Geoffrey Miller: Some good information about what seems to be a really useful theory
good 2009/07/16: Programmers at Work: Interviews With 19 Programmers Who Shaped the Computer Industry, Susan Lammers: Good stuff. The earlier interviews (which were with the older programmers) I liked substantially more than the later ones.
great 2009/07/11: Consider the Lobster, David Foster Wallace: And I thought he couldn't push this footnote stuff any further....
good 2009/06/21: The Stuff of Thought: Language As a Window Into Human Nature, Steven Pinker: As usual, an enjoyable read, though it was often hard to figure out what exactly I had learned from each chapter.
good 2009/05/25: Wealth and Our Commonwealth: Why America Should Tax Accumulated Fortunes, William H. Gates Sr. and Chuck Collins: 99% estate tax or bust!
good 2009/05/23: The Broom of the System, David Foster Wallace: I can see the germ of the good stuff yet to come, but this one just didn't hang together in the satisfying way of Wallace's later work.
good 2009/04/19: Intelligence and How to Get It: Why Schools and Cultures Count, Richard Nisbett: An interesting overview. I was most bothered by ignoring the extremes of intelligence.
great 2009/04/08: The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century, Thomas L. Friedman: Reading this, I get a sense of what religious folk might feel readin' scripture.
good 2009/03/17: Weapons of Mass Instruction: A Schoolteacher's Journey through the Dark World of Compulsory Schooling, John Taylor Gatto: OK, but I didn't get much out of it that I hadn't already gotten out of Gatto's past writings
great 2009/03/16: The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time, Mark Haddon: Totally identified with the protagonist....
good 2009/03/14: Fast Food Nation: The Dark Side of the All-American Meal, Eric Schlosser: Interesting, but not a page-turner
great 2009/03/07: The Lexus and the Olive Tree, Thomas L. Friedman: A really interesting synthesis of different aspects of globalization into a Unifying Theory
good 2009/02/17: The Chosen: The Hidden History of Admission and Exclusion at Harvard, Yale, and Princeton, Jerome Karabel: Some very illuminating information in here. The book was too long, but for some reason I followed through to the end anyway. There was good stuff appearing pretty frequently; there was just too much padding, too.
good 2009/01/17: Excellence Without a Soul: How a Great University Forgot Education, Harry R. Lewis: Plenty of thought-provoking stuff in here. My biggest point of disagreement had to do with the downsides of large-scale spectator-oriented athletics, regardless of if that kind of activity is "natural." I also don't feel encumbered by tradition in designing future educational institutions, so conclusions based on assumptions like the continued use of lectures aren't that interesting to me.
bad 2009/01/15: Quarterlife Crisis: The Unique Challenges of Life in Your Twenties, Alexandra Robbins and Abby Wilner: I think I've been spoiled by books that analyze topics and synthesize new hypotheses or recommendations. I couldn't stand to finish this book, which is a mishmash of quoted stories grouped by topic, with minimal connecting text. From reading the description, I got the impression that most of the big elements of "quarterlife crises" weren't occurring for me, and that seems mostly accurate, based on what I read. I should make a note to, in the future, avoid reading books based on that kind of curiosity when the books were featured on Oprah.
good 2009/01/13: 100 Million Unnecessary Returns: A Simple, Fair, and Competitive Tax Plan for the United States, Michael J. Graetz: This seems like a pretty darned good proposal.
good 2009/01/09: Exit Ghost, Philip Roth: The End
great 2009/01/02: The Moral Animal, Robert Wright: More fascinating stuff, though falling off in interestingness near the end
bad 2008/12/25: The Age of Defeat, Colin Wilson: This started out interesting but devolved into seemingly random mentions of different authors and their works.
good 2008/12/22: Gentlemen Prefer Blondes, Anita Loos: Nothing to write home about
good 2008/12/21: The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World, Alan Greenspan: Got a little boring 'round the end, but interesting nonetheless
good 2008/12/06: A Class Apart: Prodigies, Pressure, and Passion Inside One of America's Best High Schools, Alec Klein: An interesting read. I couldn't help noticing how little creativity seemed to be involved in the hoops that these kids were jumping through to earn their special status.
good 2008/12/04: Tropic of Capricorn, Henry Miller: Too many spells of free association, but I forgive him. Final verdict: Rosy Crucifixion beats the Tropic originals, hands down.
good 2008/10/14: The Space Merchants, Frederik Pohl and C. M. Kornbluth: Quite well-written stylistically, and plenty of 1950's charm
good 2008/09/28: What Price Fame?, Tyler Cowen: There were some interesting spans of idea-sharing, but, in the end, I didn't really get what the point of the book was. Reading it kind of felt like standing in the way of a firehose.
good 2008/09/19: The Third Policeman, Brian O'Nolan: This reminded me of Alice in Wonderland. I checked it out because the Lost writers cite it as an influence.
bad 2008/09/19: Fort Wayne is Seventh on Hitler's List, Michael Martone: One or two of the stories were enjoyable; the rest didn't work for me. I read this because David Foster Wallace mentioned it in "E Unibus Pluram: Television and U.S. Fiction."
great 2008/09/18: Nonzero: The Logic of Human Destiny, Robert Wright: Very thought-provoking
good 2008/09/02: JPod, Douglas Coupland: Entertaining enough, but it felt like too many gimmicks with too little form or substance
good 2008/08/28: The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature, Steven Pinker: No shortage of interestin' stuff
good 2008/08/12: The Language Instinct, Steven Pinker: Not quite what I was expecting; too much focus on nitty-gritty details. The last chapter leaves me realizing that I was more interested in something like The Blank Slate, so on I go to that!
good 2008/07/30: Fortune's Formula, William Poundstone: At no point was it especially clear what the "theme" of this book was, but it was enjoyable anyway.
great 2008/07/26: The Last Samurai, Helen DeWitt: This was so frenetic and nutty, in a way I've never seen before.
great 2008/07/13: A Supposedly Fun Thing I'll Never Do Again, David Foster Wallace: Heh heh heh.
bad 2008/07/05: The Turning Point: Science, Society, and the Rising Culture, Fritjof Capra: I remember liking this book Way Back in the Day, but I can't stand it now. The author repeats the same hippie-targeted phrases over and over, with very prolix sentences that nonetheless fail to convey useful information.
good 2008/05/24: Villa Incognito, Tom Robbins: This one leaves me with the impression that Tom Robbins may be "Thomas Pynchon for Dummies."
good 2008/05/17: Sabbath's Theater, Philip Roth: Another raunchy ride from Roth
good 2008/04/04: Hey Nostradamus!, Douglas Coupland: There were a lot of loose ends. I didn't really get into it, but it was interesting and mostly well-told.
good 2007/12/29: The Unbearable Lightness of Being, Milan Kundera: Kind of rambly and weird, but weird is good
good 2007/10/28: Letting Go, Philip Roth: Kind of overdramatic
great 2007/08/30: Girl with Curious Hair, David Foster Wallace: More of the same, with more of a popular culture focus than the DFW stuff I read earlier
good 2007/08/19: Carpenter's Gothic, William Gaddis: My first impression was rage at the unconventional grammatical organization, where it's not clear what's a spoken quotation and what isn't. It got better further in, but not enough to make up for the confusion.
good 2007/07/26: Licks of Love, John Updike: John Updike doesn't disappoint.
good 2007/07/19: Generation X: Tales for an Accelerated Culture, Douglas Coupland: Pretty slick, though I was less able to identify with the characters than for Microserfs
good 2007/07/17: The Facts: A Novelist's Autobiography, Philip Roth: He couldn't avoid sticking in more of this self-referential stuff, eh? :-)
bad 2007/07/13: Mysticism and Logic, Bertrand Russell: After reading the first few essays in the book, I asked myself what I was getting out of the experience. Failing to find an answer, I set out for greener pastures. (I picked up the book because Everything and More cited it, and the title sounded interesting; that should teach me to live on the edge!)
good 2007/07/11: Everything and More: A Compact History of Infinity, David Foster Wallace: I'm left wondering how much of this is intended satirically.
good 2007/07/07: World's End, T. Coraghessan Boyle: It had its gripping stretches, but in the end it wasn't all that satisfying.
great 2007/06/23: Microserfs, Douglas Coupland: Far out. For some reason, I had formed an internal classification of this book as typical empty nerdstuff. "We generate stories for you because you don't save the ones that are yours." Recommended by mpnolan.
good 2007/06/20: Limits to Growth: The 30-Year Update, Donella Meadows, Jorgen Randers, and Dennis Meadows: Some interesting insights with solid experimental results
great 2007/06/04: The Ancestor's Tale, Richard Dawkins: Yay for evolution. The parallels between better ways of enabling evolution and better ways of building computer systems are interesting... and squirrels are cool.
great 2007/05/23: Nexus, Henry Miller: I wasn't disappointed.
good 2007/05/15: The God Delusion, Richard Dawkins: Going in, I was feeling kind of guilty, since this kind of "preaching to the choir" subject matter is so popular among hapless fanboys. Nonetheless, there were some interesting arguments in here, and it's always fun to read Dawkins's prose. Makes me want to read more science-y books, in fact.
good 2007/05/06: The Man in the High Castle, Philip K. Dick: There was some interesting stuff in here. It had a weird feeling of having been hastily written, like ol' PKD was under a tight deadline.
good 2007/04/25: Against the Day, Thomas Pynchon: Plenty of good stuff here, but not quite enough to justify the length
good 2007/03/02: Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television, Jerry Mander: Interesting, though not especially well focused
good 2007/02/22: The Waterworks, E. L. Doctorow: An all right book
great 2007/02/13: Infinite Jest, David Foster Wallace: Awesome. That footnote business required some out-of-the-ordinary place-saving apparatus for efficient reading.
good 2007/01/14: Closing Time, Joseph Heller: Kinda nifty
good 2007/01/07: Tropic of Cancer, Henry Miller: I see the germ of the endearing qualities of Rosy Crucifixion.
good 2006/12/30: I am Charlotte Simmons, Tom Wolfe: Agreeable enough, though it didn't have that special oomph.
great 2006/12/24: Oblivion, David Foster Wallace: Wild stuff.
great 2006/12/04: Plexus, Henry Miller: Now here's a ball of energy for you.
good 2006/10/27: The Counterlife, Philip Roth: More mind-blowing recursive fiction!
good 2006/10/06: Billy Bathgate, E. L. Doctorow: Mm, history-y.
good 2006/09/22: Rabbit at Rest, John Updike: So that's that.
good 2006/08/05: The Plot Against America, Philip Roth: Interestin'
great 2006/07/12: Brief Interviews with Hideous Men, David Foster Wallace: I don't usually like books of short stories or things of similar form, but this one was super. With such great power to think of twisted ideas comes great responsibility.
good 2006/06/26: My Ishmael, Daniel Quinn: More interestin' stuff
good 2006/06/17: The Story of B, Daniel Quinn: Some thoughts worth thinking
great 2006/06/11: A Man In Full, Tom Wolfe: Quite good, though suspiciously similar to Bonfire
bad 2006/06/02: Last Exit to Brooklyn, Hubert Selby, Jr.: The combination of the subject matter and the "experimental" disregard for English grammar and layout drove me away from this before I got very far into it.
great 2006/06/01: Rabbit is Rich, John Updike: This was top-notch and a significant improvement over the first two Rabbit books.
good 2006/05/10: The Late-Summer Passion of a Woman of Mind, Rebecca Goldstein: Interesting but uneven. I do wonder if the author is satirizing philosophers with some of the sections or if she really thinks that stuff is the bee's knees.
great 2006/05/03: The Bonfire of the Vanities, Tom Wolfe: That was pretty swell. It reminded me of DeLillo and Heller in particular. Who knows who influenced whom!
great 2006/04/24: David Copperfield, Charles Dickens: Great, but perhaps a bit longer than I would have liked.
good 2006/02/11: The Imaginary Girlfriend, John Irving: Not bad.
good 2006/02/06: Anansi Boys, Neil Gaiman: It took a while to get started, but it ended up being reasonably good. It can't compare with American Gods, though.
great 2006/01/18: Operation Shylock, Philip Roth: This was quite good. I had to laugh when I finished reading it; the whole thing came together so well. I'm now nominating Philip Roth for Patron Saint of Paranoiacs. (Thomas Pynchon is the other main contender, as I see it.)
good 2006/01/02: Until I Find You, John Irving: Good, but not his best.
great 2005/12/20: Sexus, Henry Miller: They don't make 'em like this anymore, no sir. There sure was a lot of sex!
good 2005/11/26: On the Road, Jack Kerouac: Mildly interesting, but nothing too great. I guess I've been spoiled by all of the post-modern stuff that came later.
good 2005/11/20: The Mind-Body Problem, Rebecca Goldstein: Interesting and worth reading. At first I was put off by the seemingly forced and unnatural style of the writing, but it stopped bothering me.
good 2005/11/14: Hocus Pocus, Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.: Slightly above average quality. I think the non-linear narrative was too non-linear.
great 2005/11/08: Something Happened, Joseph Heller: Interesting and worth reading. Do/did most middle-class Americans really live like this?
good 2005/10/22: Zuckerman Bound, Philip Roth: More good stuff.
good 2005/10/18: Lila, Robert Pirsig: Some parts were very interesting. The "story" parts were pretty poorly executed. Altogether uneven and disorganized.
good 2005/09/20: Radio Free Albemuth, Philip K. Dick: Pretty good. My kind of paranoid trip. I see more PKD in my future.
great 2005/09/11: Portnoy's Complaint, Philip Roth: Soopah doopah pizzazz.
good 2005/08/30: The Ghost Writer, Philip Roth: Every journey has a beginning. (I liked it.)
good 2005/08/18: The Great American Novel, Philip Roth: OKish and enjoyable at times. This one was entirely comic without the authentic feel that so endeared the latest Zuckerman trilogy to me.
good 2005/07/29: The Real Life of Sebastian Knight, Vladimir Nabokov: Bleh. Some brief periods when it held my interest.
good 2005/07/17: The Power and the Glory, Graham Greene: Not bad. Not awesome.
bad 2005/06/28: The Picture of Dorian Gray (and three stories), Oscar Wilde: I wanted to give this well-known story a try, and I was hoping the Wilde-ishness I'd read before wouldn't be involved too much. It was, and the interspersing of serious stuff with wit-wars didn't work very well. I didn't have the stomach to stay for the three stories.
good 2005/06/09: The Mysterious Flame of Queen Loana, Umberto Eco: Off-and-on gripping. Definitely unique and imaginative.
good 2005/05/31: It Can't Happen Here, Sinclair Lewis: All right-ish. I liked the feisty 1920's charm.
good 2005/05/24: Life of Pi, Yann Martel: It was pretty good, but uneven. Anyone who needed to wait for this one to "make you believe in the soul-sustaining power of fiction" has been living in a paper bag.
great 2005/05/22: The Catcher in the Rye, J.D. Salinger: Seal of approval granted.
great 2005/05/20: The Human Stain, Philip Roth: This was really good.
great 2005/05/15: I Married a Communist, Philip Roth: I like.
great 2005/05/04: Great Expectations, Charles Dickens: Top-notch.
good 2005/04/03: American Pastoral, Philip Roth: Hey, pretty good.
good 2005/03/20: All the Pretty Horses, Cormac McCarthy: Interestingly compelling, though I'm sure the double-quotes industry had a fit when they saw this one.
good 2005/03/05: John Barleycorn, Jack London: Pretty swell.
good 2005/02/15: Rabbit Redux, John Updike: I liked it better than the first book in this series. Definitely some good stuff here.
bad 2005/01/21: God Knows, Joseph Heller: I gave up without finishing it. It was too loose and purposeless for me. Maybe I would have liked it if I had grown up with this biblical stuff.
good 2005/01/05: Mao II, Don DeLillo: Eh. Eh.
good 2004/12/30: Trying to Save Piggy Sneed, John Irving: Not bad.
great 2004/12/28: Slow Learner, Thomas Pynchon: Not bad. I agreed with the author's comments in the introduction, which said that the last story, "The Secret Integration," was significantly better than the others.
great 2004/12/24: A Son of the Circus, John Irving: Really good. Very different from his previous books, and yet very similar at the same time.
good 2004/12/12: Portrait of an Artist, as an Old Man, Joseph Heller: Not bad.
great 2004/12/05: The Water Method Man, John Irving: A grade-A good time.
good 2004/11/26: The Body Artist, Don DeLillo: Short and sweet. Neither great nor horrible.
good 2004/11/24: Moloch, Henry Miller: Very nice writing style, when he wasn't off in the Purple Prose Nebula. Definitely promising enough to warrant trying some of his better known books.
good 2004/11/11: The World According to Garp, John Irving: It didn't quite have the life of Irving's later novels, but it had a less intense version of their quality.
great 2004/10/31: The Crying of Lot 49, Thomas Pynchon: Worth reading, if only for another masterful treatment of paranoia. A few times I wondered if Pynchon had written a paragraph just to be confusing.
bad 2004/10/28: Oblomov, Ivan Goncharov: Not very remarkable.
good 2004/10/10: Ishmael, Daniel Quinn: Interesting
great 2004/10/02: Catch-22, Joseph Heller: This is really something!
good 2004/09/18: Americana, Don DeLillo: Y'know, I really liked a lot of it, but it spent a lot of time dragging in Part 3. I also found a pathetically prolix style that DeLillo seemed to abandon immediately after this one.
great 2004/09/03: The Cider House Rules, John Irving: Great
good 2004/08/29: Cosmopolis, Don DeLillo: Pretty good
great 2004/08/27: The Underground History of American Education, John Taylor Gatto: An extremely illuminating book; highly recommended
great 2004/08/22: Vineland, Thomas Pynchon: My appreciation for this guy just grows and grows. This book is both more down-to-earth and weirded than his previous.
good 2004/08/07: Rabbit, Run, John Updike: It didn't always hold my interest, but in the end I liked it.
good 2004/07/30: Picture This, Joseph Heller: Just my luck; I picked up another nontraditional sort of deal. I enjoyed it all the same. It almost makes me angry that I've had no exposure to "Classics" in my formal education.
good 2004/07/25: Now and Then, Joseph Heller: I picked this one at random from the library shelves because the title sounded good, not realizing that it was an autobiography. It was pretty good, as autobiographies go. The writing was amazingly good. This man past age 70 had an amazing knack for writing pleasing English. So, I'm on to reading some of his fiction!
bad 2004/07/20: Old School, Tobias Wolff: Eh, mediocre.
great 2004/07/19: A Widow for One Year, John Irving: Super duper as usual.
great 2004/07/13: Libra, Don DeLillo: Very good.
good 2004/07/05: Slaughterhouse-Five, Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.: Fairly good. I find Vonnegut's repetition of phrases and overfrequent references to his other books annoying, though.
good 2004/06/29: The Fourth Hand, John Irving: Pretty good.
great 2004/06/23: Underworld, Don DeLillo: Again, it grew on me as I read it. The idea of moving backwards in time as the book progressed was very effective.
great 2004/06/05: A Prayer for Owen Meany, John Irving: Another excellent book
bad 2004/06/03: An Outcast of the Islands, Joseph Conrad: I gave it a chance, but it just couldn't hold my interest, so I gave up. The writing was waaay too verbose.
bad 2004/05/30: Keep the Aspidistra Flying, George Orwell: A curious book. I think Orwell was trying to get across a social message, but it was generally unclear which of his characters and their views he agreed with.
good 2004/05/26: The 158-Pound Marriage, John Irving: Another good one, though a bit more erotic than expected!
great 2004/05/21: Mason and Dixon, Thomas Pynchon: Very enjoyable. The 90's Pynchon is much more organized than the 70's Pynchon. The sudden songs were kept to a minimum.
good 2004/04/26: Players, Don DeLillo: This was short but reasonably enjoyable.
great 2004/04/24: The Hotel New Hampshire, John Irving: Wow. This book is amazing. Need I say more?
good 2004/04/22: Setting Free the Bears, John Irving: This book was quite good, though the quality was inconsistent in places. I got the impression that this book was one of those attempts to merge several story ideas into one book. You'll see what I mean if you read it.
bad 2004/04/14: The Psychology of Computer Programming, Gerald Weinberg: I don't think I've really taken too much away from this book, especially given that most of what it talks about is based on the outdated computing conventions of the early 1970's. However, I have to say that Gerald Weinberg is one of the best nonfiction authors I have ever read. He has a very lucid writing style that keeps the reader interested.
great 2004/04/06: V., Thomas Pynchon: Overall positive opinion, though I often felt like it lacked organization and coherence. There really wasn't any clear connection between the two parallel stories that got about equal time and merged senselessly near the end.
bad 2004/03/17: The Hero with a Thousand Faces, Joseph Campbell: I stopped reading this after the first of two parts. There were some interesting ideas, though somehow I feel like I would have gotten just as much out of a short article.
good 2004/02/19: Breakfast of Champions, Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.: An interesting story, very reminiscent of Timequake, though I read them in the reverse order to that in which they were written decades apart.
good 2004/02/18: God Bless You, Mr. Rosewater, Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.: I liked this one a lot. Very good weaving of social commentary into an engaging story.
good 2004/02/17: Cat's Cradle, Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.: I thought it was mediocre. There weren't really any sympathetic characters for me in it, and the plot came across as somewhat disorganized.
bad 2004/02/14: Strange News from Another Star, Hermann Hesse: As I would expect from a book alternately entitled "Fairy Tales," this one wasn't really my style. I hadn't realized that these short stories were written shortly before Hesse got into psychodrama.
good 2004/02/08: Irrational Man: A Study in Existential Philosophy, William Barrett: This was quite clearly written, and I feel like I understand the basics of existentialism much better now than before I read this.
great 2004/01/27: The Names, Don DeLillo: I really enjoyed this one. It was a little slow starting up, but I ended up appreciating it more in the way I would appreciate a poem than the way I would usually appreciate a novel.
good 2004/01/14: Timequake, Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.: I picked this one out expecting a novel. It turned out to be some weird unstructured autobiographical thing. Nonetheless, I ended up enjoying it.
bad 2004/01/13: Rudin/On the Eve, Ivan Turgenev: Pretty unremarkable stories.
bad 2004/01/10: Ratner's Star, Don DeLillo: Sometimes interesting, but not particularly satisfying. It reminded me more of Kafka's The Castle than the previous DeLillo books that I've liked. Instead of putting strange characters in believable situations, DeLillo puts strange characters in absurd situations for the entire book.
bad 2004/01/10: Running Dog, Don DeLillo: The streak is spoiled. This one is very different from his two books that I read previously. Somewhat enjoyable, but too action oriented. Not enough improbable conversation. Too real.
great 2004/01/05: Gravity's Rainbow, Thomas Pynchon: Interesting book. Very 70's. If all your life you've longed for a novel full of spontaneous singing, then Gravity's Rainbow may be your deliverance.
good 2003/12/20: Wuthering Heights, Emily Brontë: Recommended by opet in #haskell. I ended up enjoying it. It didn't rock my world, but that's OK.
good 2003/12/12: The Big Sleep, Raymond Chandler: I read this on recommendation from Andrew Clausen, and I was pleasantly surprised. Seeing as how it's a detective story, I was expecting something much, much more pulpy than I got. The plot and behavior of characters were close to what I expected, but it was very intelligently written.
good 2003/12/11: Great Jones Street, Don DeLillo: This one ended up being pretty enjoyable. I think it got significantly better somewhere near its middle. OK, time to stop reading DeLillo before I overdose or something.
great 2003/11/30: End Zone, Don DeLillo: Another very good book from this author. Doubly impressive for being centrally about football and still being enjoyable for me.
good 2003/11/27: Nabokov's Dozen, Vladimir Nabokov: Mixed feelings. I liked the story about the crazy kid. :-)
good 2003/10/20: The Great Gatsby, F. Scott Fitzgerald: Not stupendous, but surprisingly good for something so often assigned in high school English classes
bad 2003/10/13: Forty Stories, Donald Barthelme: Abandoned because I don't like the format.
great 2003/10/11: White Noise, Don DeLillo: :-) Good recommendation by dwb.
Geek Corner: This page is generated using XSLT. See how.